Bush Business Colbert Comedy-Central Humor Innovation Jon-Stewart News Politics The Internet TV videos YouTube

Buy Zithromax Without Prescription

Buy Zithromax Without Prescription, Ron Paul has been adopted by the internet masses. After Zithromax, Just look at the home page of Reddit or even worse, Digg, purchase Zithromax online. Generic Zithromax, Go ahead and look, I'll wait, Zithromax online cod. Japan, craiglist, ebay, overseas, paypal, How many stories about Ron Paul did you see. Paul has even set an online fundraising record, where to buy Zithromax, Zithromax treatment, raising $4.2 million dollars in one day.

It's not surprising that he's turned a lot of heads, especially considering the Republican debates so far - while Rudy Guliani, Mitt Romney, Fred Thompson and company fought over who could bury their heads furthest in the sand, Paul showed actual knowledge of how the world works and why the U.S, Buy Zithromax Without Prescription. was attacked, fast shipping Zithromax. Order Zithromax from mexican pharmacy, [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFqj5vMNV1s[/youtube]

Ron Paul is a great candidate. Without him, Zithromax over the counter, Doses Zithromax work, the most pithy statement about the war you would hear would be Guliani saying "9/11" every 60 seconds. He's also the only one trying to remind the conservative party that they are supposed to be financially conservative, Zithromax without prescription. Buy Zithromax Without Prescription, That said, it's important to note that Ron Paul would make a terrible president. Zithromax trusted pharmacy reviews, Why. First off, Zithromax from mexico, Online buying Zithromax, let's throw out some of the hot-button issues that people vehemently disagree about, but don't really impact a person's possible presidential performance, Zithromax natural. Zithromax interactions, You may be surprised to learn that Ron Paul is pro-life, since libertarians generally want the government to keep their hands of their bodies, order Zithromax from United States pharmacy, Zithromax long term, but that's really here nor there.

The real problem with a Ron Paul presidency was pointed out in a blog post by Jim Geraghty for the National Review:

So a Democratic, or even Republican Congress completes the appropriations process, buy generic Zithromax, Taking Zithromax, and sends President Paul the funding bill for, say, Zithromax use, Zithromax images, the Commerce Department. Ron Paul doesn’t think we should have a Commerce Department, so he vetoes it.

Now repeat this scenario for every single budget bill needed to keep the government working, Buy Zithromax Without Prescription. Ron Paul doesn't just believe in small government - he's a libertarian, buy Zithromax without prescription. Zithromax duration, No department of energy, no department of education, order Zithromax online overnight delivery no prescription. Kjøpe Zithromax på nett, köpa Zithromax online, Someone putting lead in your drinking water. Don't look to Ron Paul's EPA to test, discount Zithromax, Rx free Zithromax, monitor, or regulate, Zithromax price. Buy Zithromax Without Prescription, The invisible hand of capitalism will protect you. Buy Zithromax no prescription, Watch this interview with Jon Stewart on the Daily Show - he honestly thinks that a free market in health care is possible, and that corporations deliver services better than anyone else, buy Zithromax online cod. Zithromax mg, Free markets are great for creating wealth and delivering many different kinds of goods and services, but browsing supermarkets for the freshest oranges is different from fighting cancer. Anyone who thinks the emergency room is filled with rational actors dispassionately pursuing their best interest by choosing among competing sellers might want to get back in touch with reality.

I understand the libertarian temptation, and I think I know why so many bloggers and other web users have fallen so head-over-heels for Ron Paul. It's very flattering to think of yourself as a self-made man, and looking back, didn't you really pull yourself up by your own bootstraps, Buy Zithromax Without Prescription. You've never been on welfare, you're young and you've never needed Medicare or Social Security. All those government programs are just pork, wasting your hard-earned dollars!But the truth is, everyone one of us has been helped along in some way by the federal government. At the very least you've driven on the highways, relied upon the FDA to make sure your food and drugs are reasonable safe, and if you went to college, you've benefited from federal grant money.

That's not license for government waste, corruption, and violation of our civil rights, butI would much rather have a president who wants to improve the system than one who wants to strangle it.

And, as you scroll down to the comments form to tell me exactly why I'm wrong, keep in mind that the medium you're using to rip me a new one started as a Ron Paul-antagonizing government program.

Similar posts: Buy Sonata Without Prescription. Buy Retin-A Without Prescription. Fluconazole For Sale. Tafil-Xanor For Sale. Retin-A For Sale. Order Deltasone from mexican pharmacy. Lexotan from mexico. Buy Viagra from mexico. Generic Erimin. Buy Sonata no prescription.
Trackbacks from: Buy Zithromax Without Prescription. Buy Zithromax Without Prescription. Buy Zithromax Without Prescription. Buy Zithromax Without Prescription. Buy Zithromax Without Prescription. Zithromax duration. Order Zithromax online c.o.d. No prescription Zithromax online. Rx free Zithromax. Zithromax no prescription.

Imitrex For Sale

Imitrex For Sale, Before we answer that question, take a look at the video below. This is Jon Stewart interviewing Chris Matthews about his new book, buying Imitrex online over the counter, Cheap Imitrex, Life's a Campaign: What Politics Has Taught Me About Friendship, Rivalry, buy Imitrex no prescription, Imitrex images, Reputation, and Success:


This is very different from most interviews with authors touring news and talk shows in support of their new book, fast shipping Imitrex. Imitrex use, The most obvious difference is that Stewart has a strong opinion and actually takes Matthews to task for what in the book. Most interviews consist of fluffy questions like, "so what inspired you to write this book" followed by 60 seconds of uninterrupted marketing while the interviewer casts loving gazes the author's way.The most shocking thing for me, though, is that Stewart has actually read Matthews' book and come up with his own, very informed, opinion about it, Imitrex For Sale. It sounds disgusting, Imitrex gel, ointment, cream, pill, spray, continuous-release, extended-release, Imitrex canada, mexico, india, but I don't think I've gotten this impressions from any "real news" shows in the past.Take a look at The Daily Show interview with Alan Greenspan:


Not only has Stewart read the book, but he comes up with a fundamental question in free market economics, get Imitrex. Buy Imitrex from canada, Here's something even more shocking: Stewart not only reads these books, but he remembers them and uses all these interviews as an opportunity to expand his own knowledge of a subject, online buy Imitrex without a prescription. Buy Imitrex without prescription, The evidence. Watch this interview with U.S, canada, mexico, india. Imitrex For Sale, ambassador to the UN, John Bolton:


Stewart brings up a very good point - Lincoln responded to the very divisive politics of his day by bringing in people who disagreed with him, rather than pulling in only true-believers. Order Imitrex from United States pharmacy, Bolton shoots him down, saying Lincoln did nothing of the sort, Imitrex pictures. Online buying Imitrex hcl, But Stewart is right. He talked about it with historian Doris Kearns Goodwin all the way back in 2005.He actually called Doris Kearns Goodwin back on the verify that he wasn't just making these things up:


These are just a few cases, Imitrex dose. Generic Imitrex, The Comedy Central web site (and YouTube, and every other video site) is littered with many more, Imitrex for sale. Imitrex dosage, Why is Jon Stewart doing better journalism on a comedy show than anyone on the news channels. Herbal Imitrex. Low dose Imitrex. Australia, uk, us, usa. Imitrex samples. Where can i buy Imitrex online. Imitrex interactions. Imitrex coupon. Order Imitrex from mexican pharmacy. Imitrex used for. Buy Imitrex online cod. Imitrex street price. Buy cheap Imitrex no rx. Imitrex blogs.

Similar posts: Buy Deltasone Without Prescription. Sildenafil Citrate For Sale. Buy Tramadol Without Prescription. Buy Tafil-Xanor Without Prescription. Buy Imitrex Without Prescription. Discount Ativan. Discount Tafil-Xanor. Serax dosage. Alertec results. Rx free Ultram.
Trackbacks from: Imitrex For Sale. Imitrex For Sale. Imitrex For Sale. Imitrex For Sale. Imitrex For Sale. Rx free Imitrex. Imitrex from canada. Imitrex from canadian pharmacy. Imitrex from mexico. Buy Imitrex online no prescription.

What’s Wrong with Mainstream News Reporting, from Mika to Moore to Murrow

Many years ago, I got a bachelor's degree in journalism. After considering a few $20,000 per year job offers, I decided to work in web development instead. For a few years, I would read the paper or check out the news and wish I was writing instead of coding. Not so much any more. I don't think I could put up with the crap. Much like Mika Brzezinski from MSNBC, who just couldn't stomach reporting about Paris Hilton any more: [youtube]6VdNcCcweL0[/youtube] But it's not just about fluff like Paris Hilton. We already know that judging by sheer weight of coverage, Anna Nicole Smith's death was much more important that the passing of Kurt Vonnegut. The real problem is that since 9/11, the fourth estate has acted a lot like the first estate's adoring puppy. You might not be a huge Michael Moore fan, but take a look at this video at CNN (CNN doesn't provide any way to embed video, so I can't post it direct). Wolf Blitzer has not sunk quite to the National Enquirer level, and he's not exactly a partisan hack either, so he got two points above most of the people on CNN, Fox, etc. But Moore is right - Wolf Blitzer is one of the few people in the world with the ability to ask Bush, Cheney, and other very powerful people the questions that need to be asked. And he has largely failed to do so. I love The Daily Show and The Colbert Report, but every time I watch I also become a little sad. Sad because these are the only shows that bother to call public figures and politicians on their obvious BS, and they are comedy shows! For the past 6 years, the fake news has performed more of a public service than the real news. I wonder if Edward R. Morrow would be working for Comedy Central today. I don't want to end this on a down note, so just for fun, here's an example of the best reporting on TV today: .

George W. Bush Busts a Move

I don't think I can add anything to this. George W. Bush busts a move with some African dancers, via the Daily Show: More video of the move-busting... [youtube]FIuODSIuHLo[/youtube]

Two Reasons Why the Viacom-YouTube Debate is Important

Just last year I wrote a little bit about why YouTube works. Since then, two major things have happened: YouTube was bought by Google, and large copyright-holding corporations finally noticed it. The almost inevitable result? Billion-dollar lawsuits. I'll let The Daily Show explain the situation better than I can: [youtube]w9CRD1COCAY[/youtube] But really, who cares?  Two multi-billion dollar companies duking it out in court surely doesn't effect you or I.  But there are at least two reasons why it does matter. 1.  It's not about stealing TV shows, and it's not really about YouTube in particular.  It's about control and availability of information. Let me explain:  Viacom doesn't offer all of it's material online, but Comedy Central at least has it's "motherload" interface.  The clip I posted above - and apologies if it has already been deleted - is available there.  They even have a little "embed" link, to help you post the clip in your blog. Notice I didn't use that embed link, and instead have the same clip from YouTube.  No, I'm not trying to be ironic.  I tried using the Comedy Central clip but noticed something sort of odd.  It says "This video expires 04/22/2007." One of the main reasons the Web is so powerful, and so important, is that it makes publishing, storing, and retrieving information cheap, fast, and easy.  Not a little cheaper, a little faster, a little easier - we are talking orders of magnitude. In the past, there were reasons why information might disappear, or be difficult to find.  Books went out of print because someone had to actually print books.  But now, there is no longer any real excuse.  Videos don't naturally expire on a certain date, like bologna.  Keeping the video around for a while doesn't really cost Viacom that much, and bandwidth and storage prices are always going down. I'm sure lots of people use YouTube just to watch TV shows without paying for them, but that's not why YouTube is important - it is important because it makes video available for comment, by anyone, basically forever.  So when a senate candidate uses an delightfully unfamiliar racial slur, but no major news networks are around, the video still gets out. So why should we care that clips from a network that has puppets making crank phone calls are available too?  There's no way to cordon off the important video from the unimportant, because it's too subjective.  In fact, Comedy Central is the perfect example - it has actually been the source for some very, very important video over the past few years. Steven Colbert's explanation of the concept of truthiness was the most insightful commentary on the current administration and it's backers to be seen on any channel.  But I can't find it on Comedy Central's web site.  And any video site hosting it, even in the fair use context of commentary and scholarship, is likely to get a DMCA letter to take it down. If the Viacoms of the world get their way, we will lose something new and amazing - the democratization of commentary and reference in the world of video. 2.  If Viacom wins, in the long term Viacom loses.  Again, video clips are not bologna.  This Daily Show video expires because Viacom doesn't understand the Internet.  The Colbert truthiness video is not immediately available for commentary because Viacom doesn't understand the Internet.  Some stuffy old guy in a well-appointed office made this decision, and the thinking went something like this: "Hmm, this video clip thing is hot according to CEO Fad Magazine, but I don't fully understand how to monetize it."  I suppose he understands enough to put a billion-dollar price tag on the copyright infringement, but not enough to actually make a billion dollars by putting video clips online.  Will this cannibalize DVD sales?  Will people stop subscribing to cable altogether?  So many scary questions! Meanwhile, people like YouTube founders Chad Hurley and Steve Chen, sitting where ever they used to sit, were thinking more like this:  "Wow, we've done the math and the Internet has made an amazing thing possible that has never been possible before.  Let's do it." Now think back to all of the biographies you've read about inventors, founders of major companies, scientists and engineers.  Which mentality, do you think, has driven the American economy to create such amazing amounts of wealth?  How many companies stay successful by avoiding change, becoming confused and disoriented by new possibilities, and trying to fight new technologies with lawsuits? Viacom needs to get a clue and embrace the fact that video distribution and storage has suddenly become easier, faster and cheaper.  They don't have to do so by letting YouTube host videos, but ignoring the lessons that YouTube is teaching the rest of the world is not a good long-term strategy. This is important because there is a lot of money, and there are a lot of entrenched interests, on the clueless side.  These companies are sitting on top of a gold mine but more worried about putting up fences than actually digging up the gold. I don't really care if YouTube or Google Video or iFilm or whoever has clips of this show or that.  I'm not interested in whether they paid for them, if so how much, whatever.  If this was all just fighting over whether or not college kids can watch blurry little South Park clips for free in their dorms, we could all safely ignore it. But this is important, and hopefully you are paying attention.